3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.78%
Revenue growth under 50% of E4C.DE's 31.98%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
19.93%
Positive gross profit growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
147.57%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
147.57%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.06%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
21.43%
Positive EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
21.43%
Positive diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.68%
Slight or no buybacks while E4C.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while E4C.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.89%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to E4C.DE's 62.09%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
63.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to E4C.DE's 58.70%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
368.90%
Below 50% of E4C.DE's 1382.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
368.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.23% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
41.23%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3637.61%
AR growth well above E4C.DE's 43.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.19%
Inventory growth of 4.19% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.00%
Negative asset growth while E4C.DE invests at 12.77%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.69%
75-90% of E4C.DE's 6.05%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-14.64%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.55%
SG&A growth of 11.55% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.