PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.38%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.68%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 8.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-128.13%
Negative EBIT growth while E4C.DE is at 33.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-128.13%
Negative operating income growth while E4C.DE is at 29.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-38.33%
Negative net income growth while E4C.DE stands at 6049.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-41.18%
Negative EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 6140.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-41.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 6140.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.03%
Slight or no buybacks while E4C.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.03%
Diluted share change of 2.03% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.89%
Positive OCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
49.45%
Positive FCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while E4C.DE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.33%
We show growth while E4C.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
17.09%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
44.33%
BV/share growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 6.48%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
7.51%
We have some new debt while E4C.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.