PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.21%
Revenue growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 9.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-55.14%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
17.70%
Positive EBIT growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.40%
Positive operating income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.91%
Positive net income growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.42%
Positive EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.42%
Positive diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.20%
Slight or no buybacks while E4C.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.20%
Slight or no buyback while E4C.DE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
18.14%
Dividend growth of 18.14% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.95%
Negative OCF growth while E4C.DE is at 46.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-69.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
65.64%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.43%
Positive 10Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
128.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 128.08% while E4C.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.14%
AR growth well above E4C.DE's 31.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
25.89%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. E4C.DE's 70.68%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
25.70%
Positive asset growth while E4C.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.10%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
91.53%
We have some new debt while E4C.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.