PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.77%
Negative revenue growth while E4C.DE stands at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-22.70%
Negative gross profit growth while E4C.DE is at 4.90%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-59.22%
Negative EBIT growth while E4C.DE is at 96.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-58.79%
Negative operating income growth while E4C.DE is at 106.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-62.10%
Negative net income growth while E4C.DE stands at 81.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-62.07%
Negative EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 81.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-62.07%
Negative diluted EPS growth while E4C.DE is at 81.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.81%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
197.33%
OCF growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 12.87%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
287.89%
Positive FCF growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.49%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.30%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-17.68%
Firm’s AR is declining while E4C.DE shows 10.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-3.26%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.30%
Negative asset growth while E4C.DE invests at 6.55%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.91%
Positive BV/share change while E4C.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.83%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
We cut SG&A while E4C.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.