PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.21%
Positive revenue growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-55.14%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
17.70%
Positive EBIT growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.40%
Positive operating income growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.91%
Net income growth at 75-90% of LSX.DE's 25.59%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
18.42%
EPS growth similar to LSX.DE's 18.18%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
18.42%
Similar diluted EPS growth to LSX.DE's 18.18%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
1.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LSX.DE's 4.93%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.20%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LSX.DE's 4.94%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
18.14%
Dividend growth of 18.14% while LSX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-57.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-69.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
65.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of LSX.DE's 365.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.43%
Below 50% of LSX.DE's 400.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.30%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LSX.DE is 215.06%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
128.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 128.08% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while LSX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.14%
AR growth of 16.14% while LSX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
25.89%
We show growth while LSX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
25.70%
Asset growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 4.95%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.10%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
91.53%
We have some new debt while LSX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.