3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 7.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MZX.DE is 137.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is 333.11%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while MZX.DE is at 40.20%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 749.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MZX.DE invests at 4159.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-4.57%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
20.58%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
21.66%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-100.00%
We have a declining book value while MZX.DE shows 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
80.69%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.