PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.96%
Positive revenue growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.44%
Positive gross profit growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
141.21%
Positive EBIT growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
133.19%
Positive operating income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
116.53%
Positive net income growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
116.41%
Positive EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
116.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.50%
Dividend growth of 9.50% while MZX.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-23.68%
Negative OCF growth while MZX.DE is at 263.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.64%
Negative FCF growth while MZX.DE is at 606.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
67.14%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
31.65%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
1.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MZX.DE stands at 34.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
56.28%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MZX.DE's 99.81%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-4.30%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
142.29%
Below 50% of MZX.DE's 605.01%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
105.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 42.12%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
71.57%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 17.73%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.28%
We show growth while MZX.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
3.81%
Positive asset growth while MZX.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.05%
Positive BV/share change while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.24%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.