PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.70%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.63%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-35.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-51.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-51.81%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-51.81%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
600.75%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while MZX.DE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
16.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.98%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
31.42%
FCF growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.75%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.75%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.84%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MZX.DE's 39.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-73.41%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.16%
Positive short-term equity growth while MZX.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.12%
Dividend/share CAGR of 28.12% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
30.40%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.40% while MZX.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.75%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
12.92%
We have some new debt while MZX.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.48%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.