3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.38%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-5.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-7.68%
Gross profit decline while E4C.DE shows 8.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.38%
Margin decline while E4C.DE shows 45.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Operating expenses growth less than half of E4C.DE's 7.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.77%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.05%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-119.34%
EBITDA decline while E4C.DE shows 0.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.66%
EBITDA margin decline while E4C.DE shows 34.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-128.13%
Operating income decline while E4C.DE shows 29.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.05%
Operating margin decline while E4C.DE shows 72.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.87%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of E4C.DE's 27.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-36.68%
Pre-tax income decline while E4C.DE shows 37.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while E4C.DE shows 82.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.97%
Tax expense reduction while E4C.DE shows 12.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.33%
Net income decline while E4C.DE shows 6049.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.12%
Net margin decline while E4C.DE shows 8102.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 6140.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.18%
Diluted EPS decline while E4C.DE shows 6140.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.03%
Share count increase while E4C.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.03%
Diluted share change of 2.03% while E4C.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.