PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x E4C.DE's 15.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
19.95%
Similar cost growth to E4C.DE's 23.81%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
15.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 2.53%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.36%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 2.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.59%
Similar total costs growth to E4C.DE's 15.63%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x E4C.DE's 0.82%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
342.90%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 2.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
305.80%
EBITDA margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.12%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 6.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
228.04%
Operating margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.36%
Other expenses growth while E4C.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.99%
Pre-tax income growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.92%
Pre-tax margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.20%
Tax expense growth while E4C.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.37%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x E4C.DE's 5.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.38%
Net margin growth while E4C.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
EPS change of 20.00% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
20.00%
Diluted EPS change of 20.00% while E4C.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
7.82%
Share count reduction below 50% of E4C.DE's 11.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
7.82%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of E4C.DE's 11.61%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.