PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.82%
Revenue growth 50-75% of LSX.DE's 53.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
20.19%
Cost growth less than half of LSX.DE's 132.54%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
48.93%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x LSX.DE's 29.20%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.13%
Margin expansion while LSX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 34.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
45.36%
Total costs growth 50-75% of LSX.DE's 62.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.82%
D&A growth while LSX.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.55%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-144.66%
Operating income decline while LSX.DE shows 6.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-133.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-422.12%
Other expenses reduction while LSX.DE shows 216.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-227.52%
Pre-tax income decline while LSX.DE shows 13.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-196.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.99%
Tax expense reduction while LSX.DE shows 15.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-375.30%
Net income decline while LSX.DE shows 26.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-307.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
EPS decline while LSX.DE shows 24.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while LSX.DE shows 24.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-100.00%
Diluted share reduction while LSX.DE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.