PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
46.67%
Positive growth while LSX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
45.52%
Cost increase while LSX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
48.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x LSX.DE's 2.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.95%
Margin expansion below 50% of LSX.DE's 16.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.56%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LSX.DE's 5.98%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
29.02%
Total costs growth while LSX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.25%
D&A growth less than half of LSX.DE's 661.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
281.67%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x LSX.DE's 166.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
160.22%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to LSX.DE's 175.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
1383.88%
Operating income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
975.33%
Operating margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-104.56%
Other expenses reduction while LSX.DE shows 69.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
326.02%
Pre-tax income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
254.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3436.88%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of LSX.DE's 5400.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
202.37%
Net income growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
169.80%
Net margin growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
211.76%
EPS growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
211.76%
Diluted EPS growth while LSX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.33%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.33%
Diluted share reduction while LSX.DE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.