PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.49%
Revenue decline while LSX.DE shows 20.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.64%
Cost growth less than half of LSX.DE's 75.04%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-10.59%
Gross profit decline while LSX.DE shows 10.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.63%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.75%
Total costs reduction while LSX.DE shows 8.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.54%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.47%
Operating income growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 111.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.27%
Operating margin growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 109.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-290.25%
Other expenses reduction while LSX.DE shows 108.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.73%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 344.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.88%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 303.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-51.82%
Tax expense reduction while LSX.DE shows 218.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
82.80%
Net income growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 339.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
91.38%
Net margin growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 299.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.29%
EPS growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 345.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
69.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of LSX.DE's 345.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.26%
Share count increase while LSX.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.00%
Diluted share change of 10.00% while LSX.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.