PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.63%
Revenue decline while LSX.DE shows 29.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.36%
Cost reduction while LSX.DE shows 30.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.06%
Gross profit decline while LSX.DE shows 29.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.46%
Margin expansion while LSX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.28%
Operating expenses growth while LSX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.15%
Total costs reduction while LSX.DE shows 0.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.30%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-50.38%
EBITDA decline while LSX.DE shows 110.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.48%
EBITDA margin decline while LSX.DE shows 107.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.66%
Operating income decline while LSX.DE shows 134.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.74%
Operating margin decline while LSX.DE shows 126.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
89.96%
Other expenses growth less than half of LSX.DE's 971.43%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-39.85%
Pre-tax income decline while LSX.DE shows 134.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while LSX.DE shows 126.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.99%
Tax expense reduction while LSX.DE shows 117.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.00%
Net income decline while LSX.DE shows 122.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.94%
Net margin decline while LSX.DE shows 117.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.50%
EPS decline while LSX.DE shows 122.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.50%
Diluted EPS decline while LSX.DE shows 122.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.75%
Share count reduction below 50% of LSX.DE's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.75%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LSX.DE's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.