PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.82%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.19%
Cost increase while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
48.93%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.13%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.84%
Operating expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.36%
Total costs growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.82%
D&A growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 16.36%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-36.55%
EBITDA decline while MZX.DE shows 6.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-52.23%
EBITDA margin decline while MZX.DE shows 18.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-144.66%
Operating income decline while MZX.DE shows 12.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-133.63%
Operating margin decline while MZX.DE shows 23.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-422.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-227.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-196.01%
Pre-tax margin decline while MZX.DE shows 5.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-375.30%
Net income decline while MZX.DE shows 29.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-307.27%
Net margin decline while MZX.DE shows 42.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while MZX.DE shows 500.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MZX.DE shows 500.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.