PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
31.01%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
33.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 9.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
28.02%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.18%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 2.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.24%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 4.53%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.50%
D&A reduction while MZX.DE shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
178.87%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
112.86%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
569.92%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
458.69%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-925.11%
Other expenses reduction while MZX.DE shows 12.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
247.92%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
212.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.38%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
166.51%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.77%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.