PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.43%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.53%
Cost increase while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.32%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.10%
Margin decline while MZX.DE shows 1.28% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.96%
Operating expenses reduction while MZX.DE shows 0.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.59%
Total costs growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.61%
D&A reduction while MZX.DE shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.25%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.75%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
229.06%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
203.49%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
444.01%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
401.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
183.17%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
133.80%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.63%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.