PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.96%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.53%
Cost increase while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
14.44%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.01%
Margin expansion while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-160.54%
Other expenses reduction while MZX.DE shows 172.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.56%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.80%
Total costs growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.91%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x MZX.DE's 25.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
10.85%
D&A growth while MZX.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
54.32%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.64%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
133.19%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.09%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.82%
Other expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
251.13%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
231.39%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2119.51%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.53%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.36%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.41%
EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.41%
Diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.