PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.68%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
31.67%
Cost growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 1.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
101.16%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
43.00%
Margin expansion while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.28%
Other expenses reduction while MZX.DE shows 4.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
34.61%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 4.31%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
31.95%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 3.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-55.38%
Interest expense reduction while MZX.DE shows 3.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.72%
D&A growth while MZX.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
98.96%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.43%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.20%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
156.05%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.35%
Other expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
367.74%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
232.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.91%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
638.48%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
424.95%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
649.06%
EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
649.06%
Diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.