PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
3.02 - 3.02
2.85 - 3.74
400 / 3.8K (Avg.)
12.58 | 0.24
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.10%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-36.08%
Cost reduction while MZX.DE shows 128.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
236.90%
Positive growth while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
200.54%
Margin expansion while MZX.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8604.79%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
420.82%
Operating expenses growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.86%
Total costs growth while MZX.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.16%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 7.76%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
4.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x MZX.DE's 0.71%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
24.43%
EBITDA growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.00%
EBITDA margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.38%
Operating income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.67%
Operating margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.99%
Other expenses growth less than half of MZX.DE's 1785.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
44.18%
Pre-tax income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
67.08%
Tax expense growth while MZX.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
36.31%
Net income growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.60%
Net margin growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.50%
Diluted EPS growth while MZX.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.