33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
244.38%
Cash & equivalents growing 244.38% while BASE's declined -32.35%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.38%
Below half of BASE's -0.81%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
37.98%
Receivables growth 50-75% of BASE's 62.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
48.23%
Inventory growth above 1.5x BASE's 27.87%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
12.54%
Other current assets growth < half of BASE's 30.05%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
170.97%
≥ 1.5x BASE's 6.23%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
1.44%
Below half BASE's -13.95%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.90%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
14.90%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-27.28%
Below half of BASE's -99.18%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
20.70%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.45%
Less than half of BASE's 115.10%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
7.91%
0.5-0.75x BASE's 13.42%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
86.77%
≥ 1.5x BASE's 6.57%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
29.38%
Less than half of BASE's -45.34%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.04%
Below half of BASE's 43.10%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
52.46%
Exceeding 1.5x BASE's 22.85%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
18.95%
Less than half of BASE's 40.67%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.74%
Below half BASE's -0.48%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
113.30%
Less than half of BASE's -60.85%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-79.68%
Above 1.5x BASE's -19.92%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.58%
Less than half of BASE's 37.09%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1350.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-37.83%
≥ 1.5x BASE's -4.03%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-308.70%
50-75% of BASE's -572.41%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
257.16%
Below half BASE's -4.31%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
86.77%
≥ 1.5x BASE's 6.57%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
-27.28%
≥ 1.5x BASE's -16.71%. David Dodd sees far stronger investment expansions than competitor.
-2.72%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-555.11%
Less than half of BASE's 32.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
