33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-6.66%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-6.66% vs BASE's -50.18%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.66%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x BASE's -2.37%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
3.50%
Receivables growth less than half of BASE's -32.90%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
26.99%
Inventory growth below half of BASE's -1.99%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
5.66%
Other current assets growth < half of BASE's -0.50%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.87%
Below half of BASE's -6.74%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
4.70%
Below half BASE's 180.06%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.54%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.54%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both BASE and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.73%
Less than half of BASE's -5.76%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.84%
Below half of BASE's 58.03%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.46%
Below half of BASE's -3.52%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-25.49%
Less than half of BASE's 37.29%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.68%
Below half of BASE's -0.79%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-4.41%
Less than half of BASE's 116.12%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
4.13%
Less than half of BASE's -6.10%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.32%
Below half BASE's -15.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.17%
Less than half of BASE's -100.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-4.33%
Less than half of BASE's 145.84%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.62%
Less than half of BASE's -0.87%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.71%
1.25-1.5x BASE's -5.80%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
185.42%
Less than half of BASE's -351.79%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.68%
0.5-0.75x BASE's -4.87%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-1.46%
Below half BASE's -3.52%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Below half BASE's 39.13%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-4.00%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.16%
Less than half of BASE's 58.90%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
