33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
41.93%
Cash & equivalents growing 41.93% while BASE's declined -7.55%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-8.67%
Short-term investments yoy growth below half of BASE's 7.09%. Michael Burry might see potential liquidity risk. Investigate alternative capital uses or constraints.
3.41%
Similar yoy growth to BASE's 3.69%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
30.94%
Receivables growth less than half of BASE's 72.69%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-1.16%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
18.75%
Other current assets growth < half of BASE's -21.04%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.17%
0.5-0.75x BASE's 17.55%. Martin Whitman might see risk if this hampers near-term financial flexibility.
-2.08%
Below half BASE's -10.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.03%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.03%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.22%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating better performance.
100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.03%
Less than half of BASE's 34.45%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.63%
Below half of BASE's 14.37%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.61%
0.5-0.75x BASE's 17.14%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
103.09%
Less than half of BASE's -53.73%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-13.02%
Less than half of BASE's -100.00%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.41%
Below half of BASE's 38.61%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-56.14%
Less than half of BASE's 88.38%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
16.39%
Less than half of BASE's 39.65%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-100.00%
Similar yoy to BASE's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approaches to long-term financing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.82%
Less than half of BASE's -100.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-8.00%
Less than half of BASE's 25.45%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.45%
Less than half of BASE's 38.98%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
2.94%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to BASE's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.70%
Below half BASE's -2.84%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.16%
1.25-1.5x BASE's 2.43%. Martin Whitman is wary of complicated equity expansions.
7.01%
≥ 1.5x BASE's 0.66%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
8.61%
0.5-0.75x BASE's 17.14%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
-0.37%
Below half BASE's 7.09%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-6.60%
Less than half of BASE's -25.94%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-98.00%
Less than half of BASE's 3.61%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
