PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-149.00%
Negative net income growth while CFLT stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
803.92%
Some D&A expansion while CFLT is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.19%
SBC growth while CFLT is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
42.97%
Less working capital growth vs. CFLT's 100.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1607.24%
AR is negative yoy while CFLT is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
191.17%
Inventory growth of 191.17% while CFLT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
431.47%
A yoy AP increase while CFLT is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
354.20%
Growth well above CFLT's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4830.17%
Well above CFLT's 399.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-452.24%
Negative yoy CFO while CFLT is 125.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
37.56%
Some CapEx rise while CFLT is negative at -10.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
2230.85%
Acquisition spending well above CFLT's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-19.24%
Negative yoy purchasing while CFLT stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.11%
Both yoy lines are negative, with CFLT at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-2230.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while CFLT is 292.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2836.98%
We reduce yoy invests while CFLT stands at 146.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.49%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CFLT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3585.66%
Stock issuance far above CFLT's 100.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.