PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.87%
Some net income increase while EXFY is negative at -177.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-85.57%
Negative yoy D&A while EXFY is 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.75%
SBC growth while EXFY is negative at -13.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-134.02%
Negative yoy working capital usage while EXFY is 463.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-327.10%
AR is negative yoy while EXFY is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-22.51%
Negative yoy inventory while EXFY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
179.54%
AP growth well above EXFY's 204.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
117.34%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. EXFY's 368.07%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-103.89%
Negative yoy while EXFY is 19.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-23.46%
Negative yoy CFO while EXFY is 85.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.38%
Lower CapEx growth vs. EXFY's 96.59%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.92%
Negative yoy purchasing while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
4.07%
Liquidation growth of 4.07% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-101.23%
We reduce yoy other investing while EXFY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1289.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with EXFY at -135.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
9.68%
Debt repayment growth of 9.68% while EXFY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1894.43%
Stock issuance far above EXFY's 29.02%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.