PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.24%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with FLNC at -27.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.37%
Some D&A expansion while FLNC is negative at -11.80%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while FLNC stands at 782.39%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-61.84%
Negative yoy SBC while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
17.00%
Slight usage while FLNC is negative at -104.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-65.52%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FLNC at -164.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-110.27%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FLNC at -20.03%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
24.60%
A yoy AP increase while FLNC is negative at -170.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
40.65%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FLNC's 108.37%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
401.33%
Some yoy increase while FLNC is negative at -99.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-10.58%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with FLNC at -52.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-27.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while FLNC is 32.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-23.26%
We reduce yoy invests while FLNC stands at 32.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
56.55%
Debt repayment above 1.5x FLNC's 20.00%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.00%
Buyback growth of 98.00% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.