PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
71.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x FLNC's 33.80%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
8.71%
D&A growth well above FLNC's 9.39%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-100.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-80.59%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FLNC at -52.30%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-13.93%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FLNC is 69.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
79.50%
AR growth while FLNC is negative at -227.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
17.04%
Some inventory rise while FLNC is negative at -128.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-129.69%
Negative yoy AP while FLNC is 138.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
87.52%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FLNC's 279.34%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
679.61%
Some yoy increase while FLNC is negative at -133.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.99%
Negative yoy CFO while FLNC is 59.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-13.49%
Negative yoy CapEx while FLNC is 52.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above FLNC's 104.55%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-12.29%
We reduce yoy invests while FLNC stands at 94.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-15.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with FLNC at -577.63%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-99.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with FLNC at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.