33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.45%
Some net income increase while FLNC is negative at -0.55%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.08%
D&A growth well above FLNC's 10.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.67%
SBC growth while FLNC is negative at -14.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
24.10%
Well above FLNC's 15.69% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
234.18%
AR growth while FLNC is negative at -711.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
132.91%
Inventory growth well above FLNC's 175.97%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-163.74%
Both negative yoy AP, with FLNC at -153.44%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
107.85%
Some yoy usage while FLNC is negative at -147.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-75.89%
Negative yoy while FLNC is 201.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
24.20%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x FLNC's 16.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
41.30%
Lower CapEx growth vs. FLNC's 156.45%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.30%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. FLNC's 760.78%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-2.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FLNC is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3911.65%
Issuance growth of 3911.65% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.