PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.62%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 64.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.46%
Some D&A expansion while FLNC is negative at -13.91%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.67%
SBC growth well above FLNC's 17.87%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-76.20%
Negative yoy working capital usage while FLNC is 66.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-167.50%
AR is negative yoy while FLNC is 308.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
30.20%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FLNC's 159.54%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
138.33%
A yoy AP increase while FLNC is negative at -209.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-9.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FLNC at -104.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
61.85%
Some yoy increase while FLNC is negative at -10750.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-26.15%
Negative yoy CFO while FLNC is 243.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with FLNC at -88.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.40%
Purchases growth of 5.40% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.06%
We reduce yoy sales while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.90%
We have mild expansions while FLNC is negative at -88.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-4.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.