PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.07%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 108.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.70%
Negative yoy D&A while FLNC is 78.24%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
SBC growth while FLNC is negative at -7.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-229.04%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FLNC at -158.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
79.06%
AR growth while FLNC is negative at -108.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-150.17%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FLNC at -185.88%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
54.60%
Lower AP growth vs. FLNC's 194.14%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-178.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with FLNC at -1357.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
210.38%
Well above FLNC's 102.98%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
54.00%
Some CFO growth while FLNC is negative at -132.74%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-11.68%
Negative yoy CapEx while FLNC is 51.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.24%
Purchases growth of 8.24% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
0.43%
Liquidation growth of 0.43% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
3906.00%
Growth well above FLNC's 7.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
91.39%
We have mild expansions while FLNC is negative at -21.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-7.28%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-97.96%
Negative yoy issuance while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.