PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-149.00%
Negative net income growth while FLNC stands at 8527.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
803.92%
Some D&A expansion while FLNC is negative at -7.62%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.19%
SBC growth while FLNC is negative at -10.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
42.97%
Slight usage while FLNC is negative at -102.11%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1607.24%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with FLNC at -3645.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
191.17%
Inventory growth well above FLNC's 262.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
431.47%
A yoy AP increase while FLNC is negative at -56.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
354.20%
Growth well above FLNC's 91.09%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4830.17%
Well above FLNC's 604.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-452.24%
Negative yoy CFO while FLNC is 148.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
37.56%
Some CapEx rise while FLNC is negative at -38.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
2230.85%
Acquisition growth of 2230.85% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-19.24%
Negative yoy purchasing while FLNC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-6.11%
We reduce yoy sales while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-2230.85%
We reduce yoy other investing while FLNC is 37.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2836.98%
We reduce yoy invests while FLNC stands at 7.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-57.49%
We cut debt repayment yoy while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
3585.66%
Issuance growth of 3585.66% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.