PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.35%
Some net income increase while FLNC is negative at -184.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.57%
Negative yoy D&A while FLNC is 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Well above FLNC's 99.06% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-0.05%
Both cut yoy SBC, with FLNC at -3.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
375.12%
Slight usage while FLNC is negative at -138.87%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
131.57%
AR growth well above FLNC's 113.27%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-270.03%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with FLNC at -231.87%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-136.06%
Both negative yoy AP, with FLNC at -392.99%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
14.04%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. FLNC's 4775.41%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-21.34%
Both negative yoy, with FLNC at -69.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
156.52%
Some CFO growth while FLNC is negative at -2106.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-141.62%
Negative yoy CapEx while FLNC is 35.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while FLNC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
28.54%
Purchases growth of 28.54% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.15%
We reduce yoy sales while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
120.01%
We have some outflow growth while FLNC is negative at -36.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
107.15%
Investing outflow well above FLNC's 6.24%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
37.14%
Debt repayment growth of 37.14% while FLNC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-91.73%
Negative yoy issuance while FLNC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.