PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-679.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with GTLB at -12.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-25.40%
Negative yoy D&A while GTLB is 1067.07%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-88.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
18305.81%
SBC growth well above GTLB's 48.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-72.37%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GTLB is 357.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-204.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GTLB at -102.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-2473.68%
Negative yoy inventory while GTLB is 196.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
204.05%
A yoy AP increase while GTLB is negative at -96.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-41.32%
Negative yoy usage while GTLB is 92.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
106.95%
Well above GTLB's 19.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-17.07%
Negative yoy CFO while GTLB is 89.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-155.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.06%
We reduce yoy invests while GTLB stands at 146.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.97%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.