PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.35%
Some net income increase while GTLB is negative at -49.85%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.57%
Negative yoy D&A while GTLB is 29.74%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while GTLB is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.05%
Both cut yoy SBC, with GTLB at -1.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
375.12%
Well above GTLB's 715.06% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
131.57%
AR growth well above GTLB's 200.07%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-270.03%
Negative yoy inventory while GTLB is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-136.06%
Negative yoy AP while GTLB is 141.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.04%
Some yoy usage while GTLB is negative at -77.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-21.34%
Both negative yoy, with GTLB at -77.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
156.52%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x GTLB's 53.45%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-141.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -112.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -708.40%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
28.54%
Purchases well above GTLB's 40.34%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-5.15%
We reduce yoy sales while GTLB is 23.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
120.01%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. GTLB's 24610.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
107.15%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. GTLB's 349.87%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
37.14%
Debt repayment growth of 37.14% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-91.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -66.03%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.