PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.87%
Net income growth under 50% of GTLB's 123.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-85.57%
Negative yoy D&A while GTLB is 52.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.75%
SBC growth well above GTLB's 15.90%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-134.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with GTLB at -270.90%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-327.10%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with GTLB at -196.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-22.51%
Negative yoy inventory while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
179.54%
A yoy AP increase while GTLB is negative at -98.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
117.34%
Some yoy usage while GTLB is negative at -681.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-103.89%
Both negative yoy, with GTLB at -46.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-23.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with GTLB at -69.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.38%
Some CapEx rise while GTLB is negative at -1066.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.92%
Negative yoy purchasing while GTLB stands at 17.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
4.07%
We have some liquidation growth while GTLB is negative at -52.33%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-101.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -99.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-1289.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -105.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
9.68%
Debt repayment growth of 9.68% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1894.43%
Stock issuance far above GTLB's 153.52%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.