PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-97.47%
Negative net income growth while GTLB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.04%
Less D&A growth vs. GTLB's 39.68%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.68%
SBC growth well above GTLB's 19.71%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-36.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
130.38%
AR growth well above GTLB's 196.97%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
149.84%
Inventory growth of 149.84% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-161.16%
Both negative yoy AP, with GTLB at -34.47%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
5685.63%
Growth of 5685.63% while GTLB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
46.02%
Some yoy increase while GTLB is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.32%
Negative yoy CFO while GTLB is 68.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while GTLB is 21.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -20.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
25.34%
We have some liquidation growth while GTLB is negative at -10.11%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3894.40%
Both yoy lines negative, with GTLB at -273.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-7.69%
We cut debt repayment yoy while GTLB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.