PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.24%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with S at -65.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.37%
Less D&A growth vs. S's 104.56%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while S stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-61.84%
Negative yoy SBC while S is 121.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
17.00%
Less working capital growth vs. S's 260.28%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-65.52%
AR is negative yoy while S is 150.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-110.27%
Negative yoy inventory while S is 252.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
24.60%
A yoy AP increase while S is negative at -147.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
40.65%
Some yoy usage while S is negative at -69.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
401.33%
Well above S's 5.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-10.58%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with S at -32.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-27.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while S is 22.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while S is negative at -414.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-23.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with S at -126.05%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
56.55%
Debt repayment growth of 56.55% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.00%
Buyback growth of 98.00% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.