PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.79%
Some net income increase while S is negative at -13.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
45.85%
Some D&A expansion while S is negative at -98.28%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.38%
Less SBC growth vs. S's 8.52%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
100.00%
Well above S's 28.77% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
91.58%
AR growth of 91.58% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
82.48%
Inventory growth of 82.48% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-253.69%
Negative yoy AP while S is 225.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while S is 211.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-41.29%
Both negative yoy, with S at -2.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
98.78%
Some CFO growth while S is negative at -411.91%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
4.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. S's 1403.25%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while S stands at 20.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
6.70%
We have some liquidation growth while S is negative at -2.01%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. S's 417.66%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
11.61%
Debt repayment growth of 11.61% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with S at -243.58%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.