PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-97.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with S at -194.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.04%
Some D&A expansion while S is negative at -26.26%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.68%
SBC growth while S is negative at -7.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-36.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while S is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
130.38%
AR growth well above S's 213.25%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
149.84%
Inventory growth of 149.84% while S is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-161.16%
Negative yoy AP while S is 953.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
5685.63%
Some yoy usage while S is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
46.02%
Some yoy increase while S is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.32%
Negative yoy CFO while S is 1637.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-29.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while S is 24.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while S stands at 19.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
25.34%
We have some liquidation growth while S is negative at -23.68%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3894.40%
We reduce yoy invests while S stands at 50.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7.69%
We cut debt repayment yoy while S is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.