PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-679.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TOST at -1.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-25.40%
Negative yoy D&A while TOST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-88.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TOST stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
18305.81%
SBC growth well above TOST's 24.56%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-72.37%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TOST is 55.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-204.89%
AR is negative yoy while TOST is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-2473.68%
Negative yoy inventory while TOST is 54.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
204.05%
AP growth well above TOST's 112.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-41.32%
Negative yoy usage while TOST is 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
106.95%
Some yoy increase while TOST is negative at -21.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-17.07%
Negative yoy CFO while TOST is 72.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-155.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while TOST is 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with TOST at -529.41%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-33.97%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TOST is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TOST is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.