PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.94%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.95%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXFY's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
11.82%
Positive EBIT growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.82%
Positive operating income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.87%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.40%
Positive EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.40%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.96%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.96%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.46%
Negative OCF growth while EXFY is at 85.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-29.47%
Negative FCF growth while EXFY is at 106.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
32.12%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
32.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
32.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
117.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 160.91%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
117.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 160.91%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
117.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
29.68%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
29.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXFY's 4.12%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.17%
Our AR growth while EXFY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
26.59%
Inventory growth of 26.59% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.38%
Positive asset growth while EXFY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.42%
Positive BV/share change while EXFY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.80%
We increase R&D while EXFY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. EXFY's 65.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.