33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.63%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.06%
Positive gross profit growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.87%
Positive EBIT growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4.87%
Positive operating income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.45%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.14%
Positive EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.88%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.30%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.88%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.30%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.20%
Positive OCF growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
27.27%
Positive FCF growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-26.87%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.87%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-26.87%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
60.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 96.66%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
60.31%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 96.66%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
60.31%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of EXFY's 96.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
1.38%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-6.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.03%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.83%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
2.10%
We increase R&D while EXFY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.53%
SG&A declining or stable vs. EXFY's 22.27%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.