PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.25%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXFY's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
18.60%
Positive EBIT growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.60%
Positive operating income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.79%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
312.05%
Positive EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
312.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.92%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.78%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 85.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
138.00%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x EXFY's 106.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
24.90%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.90%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
138.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXFY's 160.91%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
138.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of EXFY's 160.91%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
138.54%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
48.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
48.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
48.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXFY's 4.12%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
170.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 170.11% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
170.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 170.11% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
170.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x EXFY's 24.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.92%
Inventory growth of 1.92% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.07%
Positive asset growth while EXFY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.63%
Positive BV/share change while EXFY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.67%
We increase R&D while EXFY cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. EXFY's 65.31%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.