PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.55%
Positive revenue growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.14%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x EXFY's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
60.83%
Positive EBIT growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.13%
Positive operating income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
70.37%
Positive net income growth while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-110.47%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-110.47%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.84%
Share count expansion well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.84%
Diluted share count expanding well above EXFY's 0.84%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.55%
OCF growth at 50-75% of EXFY's 85.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
55.30%
FCF growth 50-75% of EXFY's 106.62%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
88.33%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
88.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
166.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with EXFY's 160.91%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
166.35%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to EXFY's 160.91%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
154.90%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
87.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
87.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while EXFY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
97.82%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x EXFY's 4.12%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
182.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 182.87% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
182.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 182.87% while EXFY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-46.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while EXFY is at 24.02%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.94%
Our AR growth while EXFY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-1.16%
Inventory is declining while EXFY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.61%
Positive asset growth while EXFY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.12%
Positive BV/share change while EXFY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.82%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-1.35%
We cut SG&A while EXFY invests at 65.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.