PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.17%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 95.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
17.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 72.25%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
19.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of FLNC's 45.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
19.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of FLNC's 45.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
18.38%
Positive net income growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.53%
Positive EPS growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
5.82%
Share change of 5.82% while FLNC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
5.82%
Diluted share change of 5.82% while FLNC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.97%
Negative OCF growth while FLNC is at 126.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.32%
Negative FCF growth while FLNC is at 126.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.16%
R&D dropping or stable vs. FLNC's 24.00%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
1.66%
We expand SG&A while FLNC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.