PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.88%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 25.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
10.20%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 249.60%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.49%
EBIT growth below 50% of FLNC's 88.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.49%
Operating income growth under 50% of FLNC's 140.37%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
8.47%
Net income growth under 50% of FLNC's 113.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.09%
EPS growth under 50% of FLNC's 113.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of FLNC's 108.80%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.96%
Share count expansion well above FLNC's 0.97%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.96%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FLNC's 56.39%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.07%
OCF growth under 50% of FLNC's 1560.74%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
55.27%
FCF growth under 50% of FLNC's 983.44%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
9.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 17.28%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
9.68%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 17.28%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
9.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 17.28%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
94.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
94.18%
Positive OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
94.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
33.88%
Below 50% of FLNC's 223.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
33.88%
Below 50% of FLNC's 223.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
33.88%
Below 50% of FLNC's 223.31%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
178.58%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 243.39%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
178.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 243.39%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
178.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 243.39%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.32%
Our AR growth while FLNC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8.83%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.32%
Positive asset growth while FLNC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.13%
We have a declining book value while FLNC shows 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
466.43%
We have some new debt while FLNC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
9.27%
R&D dropping or stable vs. FLNC's 47.97%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.22%
We expand SG&A while FLNC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.