PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.95%
Revenue growth under 50% of FLNC's 39.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.67%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FLNC's 109.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-93.99%
Negative EBIT growth while FLNC is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-80.62%
Negative operating income growth while FLNC is at 118.19%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-97.47%
Negative net income growth while FLNC stands at 120.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-101.01%
Negative EPS growth while FLNC is at 120.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-101.01%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FLNC is at 104.17%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.72%
Share count expansion well above FLNC's 0.57%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.72%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FLNC's 41.28%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.32%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-5.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
71.47%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
71.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
129.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x FLNC's 7.27%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
158.19%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
158.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
196.37%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FLNC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
76.40%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 106.10%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
76.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of FLNC's 106.10%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
72.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of FLNC's 113.75%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
11.07%
Below 50% of FLNC's 180.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
11.07%
Below 50% of FLNC's 180.08%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
4.69%
Positive short-term equity growth while FLNC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.44%
Positive asset growth while FLNC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.71%
1.25-1.5x FLNC's 3.78%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
2.27%
Debt growth far above FLNC's 0.11%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
13.60%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. FLNC's 17.60%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.38%
We expand SG&A while FLNC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.