Samsara Inc. (IOT)

Revenue growth at 50-75% of S's 17.17%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.

Gross profit growth under 50% of S's 16.06%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share count expansion well above S's 2.83%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above S's 2.83%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while S is at 67.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while S is at 65.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of S's 74.83%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of S's 74.83%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.

3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of S's 74.83%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while S stands at 80.93%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while S is at 80.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while S stands at 80.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of S's 509.73%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of S's 509.73%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of S's 509.73%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

AR growth well above S's 47.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.

Inventory growth well above S's 34.69%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.

R&D growth drastically higher vs. S's 22.64%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.

SG&A growth well above S's 2.30%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.