PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Samsara Inc. (IOT)
33.600.80 (-2.33%)
33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.25%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x S's 5.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
8.43%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x S's 6.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
18.60%
Positive EBIT growth while S is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.60%
Positive operating income growth while S is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.79%
Positive net income growth while S is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
312.05%
Positive EPS growth while S is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
312.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while S is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above S's 1.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.92%
Diluted share count expanding well above S's 1.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.78%
Positive OCF growth while S is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
138.00%
FCF growth 50-75% of S's 232.39%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
24.90%
10Y CAGR of 24.90% while S is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
24.90%
5Y CAGR of 24.90% while S is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
24.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of S's 211.99%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
138.54%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while S is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
138.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while S is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
138.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x S's 65.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
48.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while S is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
48.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while S is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
48.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x S's 5.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
170.11%
Positive growth while S is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
170.11%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while S is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
170.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while S is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while S shows 6.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
1.92%
Inventory growth of 1.92% while S is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.07%
Asset growth above 1.5x S's 0.85%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.63%
Positive BV/share change while S is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.67%
R&D dropping or stable vs. S's 10.77%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. S's 7.34%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.