33.44 - 34.57
31.40 - 61.90
7.61M / 5.95M (Avg.)
-152.73 | -0.22
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
12.15%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
3.51%
EBIT growth 50-75% of Technology median of 4.80%. Guy Spier would be cautious about subpar efficiency or limited pricing power.
3.51%
Operating income growth 50-75% of Technology median of 5.76%. Guy Spier would question management’s efficiency measures.
8.91%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
15.38%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
15.38%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.99%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.94%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.94%
Diluted share change of 0.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.15%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
46.36%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-28.72%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 24.04%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-28.72%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.22%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-28.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 15.62%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
85.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
85.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
85.08%
3Y OCF/share growth of 85.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
13.77%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.41% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
13.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
13.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
171.36%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.34% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
171.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
171.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.31%
AR growth of 17.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
13.94%
Inventory growth of 13.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.37%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-2.32%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-83.76%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
19.41%
R&D growth of 19.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.14%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.